![]() ![]() In May 2006, the court estimated that Chang generated US$8,790,000 in profits from the sale of Ghettopoly, and that damages of $400,000 were reasonable as reflected in the court documents. The court thus entered a "default judgment" for Hasbro's continued use of "Monopoly" as a trademark, and dismissed Chang's counterclaims, which were to revoke trademark status on Monopoly. In January 2006, Chang was found in contempt of court for failure to produce documents. In October 2003, Hasbro sued Chang over the game's similarities to Monopoly. Further such games were planned, including Hoodopoly, Hiphopopoly, and Thugopoly. ![]() Another Monopoly variant, Redneckopoly, is also available at. According to Chang's website, which still sells the game, it is also available on Amazon. Chang continued to market the game without their support. The game was pulled from the market by Urban Outfitters, just one of its many retailers. The game was criticized as offensively racist by a local chapter of the NAACP and by black clergy, as well as by Asian American groups, including the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium and Organization of Chinese Americans. Ghettopoly Board Game: Buying stolen properties, pimpin hoes, building crack houses and projects, paying protection fees and getting car jacked are some of.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |